Thursday, October 28, 2010

A Crafty Menu Means Extraordinary Food

I wasn’t aware of the controversy surrounding the menu at Tom Colicchio's Craft, because I was never lucky enough to go there…until LAST NIGHT, that is.

H(usband) had some lovely folks to take out and, after begging him to choose this place, he acquiesced.

Apparently, when Craft first opened, the menu was really complicated and extreme. Not only was it divided up by meat and fish etc., but ALSO by cooking method. So first you had to choose a protein, then you picked how you wanted it cooked - braised or roasted, for example - and THEN you picked the sauce. That was before you even thought about the side dishes, which all had to be chosen separately.

There’s something to be said for freedom of choice, but there’s also something satisfying about a chef preparing an entrée and garnishing it in the way that he or she imagines will make a perfect plate.

I like when there’s a vision, which hopefully will make the dish cohesive. Also having the extra accoutrements decided by the chef is a good way to taste things you’ve never tried before or didn’t think you liked. For example, I always think I hate quinoa, but, oh golly, was the quinoa great at Roy’s one night and I would NEVER have ordered it if left to my own devices.

Today, the menu at Craft is a lot simpler. It’s divided into first and main course sections, but you still have to pick your side dishes separately. That, to me, is absolutely no problem. You may have noticed that I’m rather opinionated (really about everything). With food, in particular, I have never been troubled by indecision.

I do know some people, though, for whom this kind of dining would be a disaster. They can’t decide on a parking place, much less put together an entire menu. Thankfully, my fellow diners had me to guide them. (Yeah, I know, they probably wished I was sitting at the next table.)

I started with my usual - ordering a Cosmopolitan made with Absolut Citron.

It was beautiful, it was lip-smacking delicious, but it was a bit different. It was more tart than usual and it tasted as if it could have been made with pink grapefruit juice. It wasn’t until later when I got home and studied the bill that I saw it had been made with Ketel Citroen. That’s funny that no one mentioned that.

Was it a fatal flaw? Of course not, but in as many places as not, I’m told that they don’t have Absolut Citron and they offer a substitute. In a fine dining establishment like this, I have to be honest, I think that’s unacceptable. And whether it was the server’s or the bartender’s fault, I think I should get back part of the SIXTEEN DOLLARS AND FIFTY CENTS that that drink cost! Luckily, I didn’t know any of this at the time, so I didn’t have to hold a grudge during the meal.

The amuses arrived in tiny cups on a single plate in the middle of the table.

Do you find that agreeably casual or do you think it’s annoying when you have to grab stuff yourself? I admit I prefer when the server SERVES. It was a slightly thickened broth of something, perhaps mushroom. I honestly wasn’t paying attention, but it was just fine.

The first courses arrived, each on its own plate, delivered to the table. That was good, because it made sharing easier.

But there was one weird thing. When we sat down, each place had a dinner plate. Fine, but there was no bread plate and the menus (changed every single day) were a single sheet of paper on a heavy wooden rectangular holder. There was no place to put the menu, except ON the plate, which left no place for the bread. Remember there was a similar menu-shifting problem at Bouley?

What should have happened (and I can’t believe that it didn’t) was for the principals of the restaurant to sit down and be served a meal. Surely the bothersome menu and service plate situation would not have gone unnoticed.

Anyway, the food was to die for.

The Artichokes were tiny, perfect representations of the vegetable, still on the tender stalk - the best part.

The Agnolotti were luscious pillows with a creamy zucchini filling and a surprisingly hearty tomato-flecked sauce.

The Hamachi was the perfect starter for a heavy meal to come.

It was impeccably fresh with a hint of spiciness. The bad thing about the simplified menu is that it doesn’t say all the bits and pieces that each dish comes with, so if you’re not paying close attention you (I) miss some of the elements of the dish.

A word of advice when you’re dining at Craft - do NOT have each person order a starch and a vegetable, like we (I) did. It’s too much food, it brings an already rocketing bill soaring higher, but it IS a great way to taste many of Craft’s offerings in a single visit.

Main courses –

The Beef Short Ribs are a signature dish and for a reason. They were meltingly tender with a robust meaty flavor. The dish was served in gorgeous little oval-shaped copper casseroles.

In thinking about it afterwards, even though I know the idea at Craft is to serve everything family style, I still would have preferred the dish served on a plate with whatever starch I was ordering. I definitely didn’t get all the sauce out of the casserole and I think I left some delectable little onions behind. I’d really like a second chance with that dish. Unfortunately a gremlin got to my entrée pictures and these are the only ones:

The Halibut and the Suzuki (a Japanese sea bass) both came out simply prepared. The suzuki was really delicate and the halibut was meaty, but still extremely moist.

The sides –

OMG, honestly, you could forget the main courses (well, maybe not the short ribs) and just order side dishes and you’d dine magnificently.

The best was the potato purée. It must have been passed through a tamis strainer. It was smoothness personified and so rich and creamy. It definitely was not whipped, but strained, maybe over and over again. I think there was garlic in there and you could have eaten that purée alone with no problem. But with the short ribs, it was a match made in heaven.

The polenta was pretty great.

Thick and smooth, and maybe if I hadn’t had the potatoes too, that would have been one of my favorites.

One problem with having a daily changing menu, dishes rotate. I had seen Rouen Duck on the menu the day before, so I was all ready to order that. Sacre Bleu! The duck had flown, so the short ribs were deputized in its place.

Luckily, there was duck risotto on the side dish menu. Wow! THAT definitely could have stood on it own.

In fact, after our all-encompassing ordering frenzy at Craft, I would feel much more prepared to go back and order with more restraint. And if I didn’t find the Rouen duck, I would be perfectly thrilled to order the duck risotto as an entrée.

The Romano Beans were wonderful.

Not usually everybody’s favorite, these very starchy, thick, flat beans were cooked to complete softness, just the way they should have been. Perfectly seasoned, they could have been ordered in place of one of the starches.

The Swiss Chard was also not cooked timidly.

It must have been blanched first and then sautéed. Perfect with the short ribs and potatoes. Again, I would have loved to have been served the short ribs, potatoes and Swiss Chard on one plate, rather than serving myself from the center of the table, so I could have gotten every last bit of juicy yumminess.

The mushrooms are special at Craft.

When there some hesitation (I know, not usual for me) about which of 4 or 5 mushrooms to order, the waiter (the same one who tricked me with my vodka) kindly offered to bring an assortment of sautéed mushrooms. They were sooo good and another great choice for a non-meat eater.

There really was no room for dessert, so, as a result, we (okay, I) ONLY ordered for HALF THE TABLE, instead of my usual ordering for HALF THE RESTAURANT.

We had one Malted Milk Semifreddo.



Actually, it was okay, but a little timid and nothing that I would have to have again. However, the ice creams were another story.

I’m so happy that my father taught me so many years ago that vanilla ice cream is a great way to judge a pastry chef.

The Vanilla Ice Cream was fantastic.

It must have been made with the finest vanilla beans (from Tahiti? Madagascar? Actually, for all I know, those are the same places), because the flavor of the vanilla was outstanding and very, very pronounced. And it tasted as if the richest heavy cream and eggs were used. AND it was quite a generous scoop.

The Pumpkin-Maple Ice Cream was on an equal footing with the vanilla.

The pumpkin flavor was intense and sweetened and spiced perfectly. Plus they were the steal of the night at $5 a scoop.

It’s funny that reader Amy recently reminded me about Tom’s impatience on Top Chef when Angelo (I think it was) wanted to tell diners HOW they’re supposed to eat something. Tom got all hot and bothered when that was used as an excuse for a poor showing with a particular dish.

Craft definitely doesn't tell its diners what to order and, more particularly, what to order TOGETHER. It's left up to the diner with a server's intervention only if requested.

What I really appreciated about Craft was that, even though it showed off American cooking at its best, other cuisines are definitely represented in its excellent dishes. The sautéing is all French; certain vegetables get a distinct Italian handling. Even Asia is represented somewhat by the fresh fish offerings for the first course.

Desserts are a great combination of American, French and Italian. The dessert menu was apparently as confusing as the main one in the beginning. But that’s been simplified, and the pastry chef, Jennifer McCoy, puts it all together for the diners in a most delicious way.

Did I expect a good meal? Of course. Did I expect an extraordinary meal? Yes. But what I didn’t expect was the luxuriousness of each and every dish, almost without a single ingredient out of place or added unnecessarily. Tom Colicchio has crafted a memorable experience with his approach to a simple, and simply remarkable, cuisine.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

It’s So Easy To Love Ina

I was so happy when the wonderful Lys mentioned that Ina was appearing on the Today Show this morning, promoting her new cookbook. It has one of the Contessa's adorable expressions as the title, How Easy Is That?

Ina’s hair was beautifully shiny and her nails were also gorgeous as she showed Meredith how to make homemade ricotta. She simply heated together milk and cream, threw in a little vinegar and drained the mixture. And, voila, 20 minutes later – homemade ricotta! How easy is that? Yup, the title definitely works.

Then Ina added lots of herbs to the newly made cheese and Meredith made a salad dressing of lemon juice, salt, pepper and olive oil (twice the oil to lemon juice) and poured it over greens. How easy is that?

Ina rubbed garlic over grilled bread and then topped it with the ricotta mixture. She said to serve it with the salad and, join me here, how easy it that?

Ina moved on to a non-traditional risotto. She added 1½ cups of Arborio rice to a big Dutch oven with four cups of hot chicken stock. She baked it at 350°F for 45 minutes and after added lots of goodies – butter (of course), more chicken stock, white wine, LOTS of parmesan cheese, salt, pepper. Ina finished it up by stirring it over the heat for 2 minutes and then stirring in frozen peas. How easy…well, you get the idea.

Lastly, Ina (she’s a pro at getting through stuff quickly while seeming to be easy and breezy) made a variation of an icebox cake. She lined a springform pan with chocolate chip cookies, covered the first layer with Kahlua and cocoa flavored cream. (OH! There’s mascarpone in there too. What a surprise…not.)

You make about five layers, then refrigerate it overnight, slice it and serve with chocolate shavings.

It actually looked extraordinary. And the variations that came to my mind were endless – white chocolate chip and macadamia nut cookies layered with bourbon flavored cream; chocolate chocolate chip cookies layered with Ina’s Kahlua cream and garnished with chocolate covered espresso beans; or how about Toll House cookies made with no chips or nuts layered with cream that’s studded with chips and nuts. One more – spread a bit of raspberry jam over each cookie layer before the cream goes on OR instead of the chocolate chip cookies, use thumbprint cookies.

WOW, Ina is a genius and HOW EASY IS THAT? She finished with time to spare…

Here is the video and here are the recipes from the Today Show.

Top Chef Just Desserts - The Desserts AND The Show Get Better

Top Chef Just Desserts - Black and White

Mean Girls starts. Oh, it’s actually Top Chef Just Desserts with Heather H. being witchy about Heather C. leaving. It's a shame that Heather H. has a legitimate complaint about Morgan being a pig to women and it gets all rolled up into her kvetching about everybody else. She and Zac and Yigit are not a particularly nice trio.

In the Top Chef kitchen, Gail introduces them to Michael Laiskonis of Le Bernardin. Finally, a reason to watch this episode! Maybe he’ll test them and show them the front of his dessert menu and make them guess what it is…at which I failed so miserably.

Michael is standing in front of a table with savory ingredients and says he’s been “raiding the savory kitchen for years.” He says that it’s important to find a balance between boldness and restraint.

Please don’t tell me that I see a piece of fish on that table.

I can handle bacon with something sweet and, while I don’t mind introducing a bit of sweetness to fish – a honey soy glaze for example, PLEASE don’t tell me anyone is going to use fish in a dessert. It’s possible that it’s duck. Actually, I really don’t know.

This is weird. The screen says QUICKFIRE CHALLENGE - Dawn Hand Renewal With Olay Beauty Quickfire.

What the heck does that mean? Is the next thing going to be that they have to cook with SOAP?!!!

Well, no matter what the screen says, Gail says they have to make a dessert with one of the savory items. And it’s going to be pretty tough, because Gail says they can use exactly one pot to make their dessert.

The good thing about that is that all the chefs are at the same disadvantage. But, wait! Listen to this - Gail says they can wash the pot as many times as they need to, “KNOWING THAT DAWN HAND RENEWAL WILL HELP YOUR HANDS SEAL IN THE MOISTURE WHILE YOU DO THE DISHES.”

This is appalling, totally appalling. I know they have to shill a certain amount of the products they use in challenges, but to be HAWKING DETERGENT is really over the top.

Morgan knocks into Heather while he grabs beets away from Zac. Erika is not wrong when she complains to Danielle about Zac taking all the bacon.

They come up with some cool stuff, though. The dishes are here.

Chef Michael didn’t like Danielle’s – He didn’t think it was sweet enough; Eric’s wasn’t particularly dessert-like and Heather’s beets were undercooked. Wow, she is not doing well…ever.

Chef Michael liked Morgan’s dish – He appreciated him taking a risk in using liquid nitrogen for the first time. (How did Michael know that?) Zac’s cake had a beautiful beet flavor and Yigit’s was bold.

Zac wins. He’s happy and he gets immunity for the Elimination Challenge. Gail offers him $1000 to give up his immunity. Zac is actually thinking about it. Is he crazy? Immunity is priceless. Hasn’t he ever watched Survivor?

Zac gets Gail to up her offer. She goes to $5000. Oh c’mon, this is so fake. HE TAKES IT. What a complete moron! Really. It’s a good thing I don’t care if he goes home. That was dumb. He says he regrets taking the money IMMEDIATELY, Duh!

On to the Elimination Challenge, which is to create a black and white dessert in honor of the LA Times’ 128th birthday. The chefs are appalled and mortified by having colors taken away from them.

Danielle gives a horror film-worthy scream (to us). I hate to say it, but I just realized what particularly bothers me about her. She looks like she has fangs and when she just screamed like that, it looked perfectly natural.

Anyway, these chefs are big babies about having to make a black and white dessert. WHAT is so hard about that? Have they never heard of chocolate and vanilla? Hello?

Obviously they can tart that up a bit, but it just doesn’t seem like such a devastatingly hard challenge to me. Michael tells them just because their palette is limited doesn’t mean their taste should be.

Yigit spouts some Turkish expression that means the goats will only drink water from the blue sea. Kidding! Just checking to see if you’re paying attention. He said something about eating with your eyes first. You know, if you REALLY think about that…EW.

Finally, we get to see cooking without an overwhelming amount of nonsense. (It IS weird, though, that they walk out of the store and into the Top Chef kitchen with very few bags.) I spoke too soon. There is a bit of nonsense.

Danielle is making the numbers 1,2 and 8 out of different ingredients and they look like a project you’d do with preschoolers. Zac is frying (to order) whoopee pies. Erika, whom I like, loves her ice cream concoction. I like Eric too. He’s just a normal guy.

Swirly-haired Johnny comes in to chat with the chefs. He’s not happy that Erika is using blackberries and that her dessert is more purple than black. She’s a bit clueless as she says, “But the flavor will be good”. I hope that’s good ENOUGH, because it’s supposed to be black and white.

Heather, strangely, makes gingerbread and is using cranberries and pomegranates. WHAT is black and white about that? Well, at least, we’re seeing more of the cooking process without an insane person ranting.

Morgan makes a perfect sheet of chocolate that he’ll cut into squares. He also makes a chocolate cake that we see him pouring toffee syrup over. The syrup looks like dirty dish water. It’s really thin and unappetizing-looking. Apparently, there WAS a problem with it and it didn’t soak into the cake. The next day Morgan is left with cake that is soggy on the outside and dry on the inside.

The chefs arrive at the venue, which is set up with black and white tablecloths and framed LA Times front pages of great moments in history.

Before service starts, Yigit is tempering his ice cream and over-reducing a fruit compote. He’s also placing little chocolate squares over little squares of chocolate cake.

Heather can’t find her Rice Krispie treats and she thinks Morgan took them. The funny thing is that nobody seems to care. She seems to be attempting to raise this to the level of the missing pea purée, but no one’s biting.

In fact, I think it’s a lucky break that she lost that element to her dessert. Should Rice Krispie treats EVER be anywhere, where there are no kids…EVEN if they HAVE been made by a fancy pastry chef?

Here are the dishes.

Yigit

Chocolate Cake with White Chocolate Mousse, Berry Compote & Almond Milk Ice Cream

Yigit says it’s a take on a millefeuille, which I don’t see at all. He has so much stuff on the plate. Johnny says the compote is gummy. Michael thinks that the (many) elements work well together.

Erika

Lemon Poppy Seed Ice Cream with White Chocolate Pavè & Blackberry Crème Brûlèe

Johnny gives Erika a hard time, because it doesn’t look BLACK and white. The judges DETEST her ice cream. Dannielle (the judge) says it tastes like glue. Johnny says it tastes like soap. Not good.

Zac

Deep Fried Whoopie Pie with Passion Fruit Cream & Asian Pear

As Zac goes into his routine for the judges, Morgan is getting fed up listening to his blathering. The judges seem to buy it, though.

Gail likes that Zac ”brought in a lot of different flavors that you wouldn’t necessarily associate with the whoopee pie”. Johnny says “the passion doesn’t come through” that strongly in the passion fruit and he thinks the cake is too sweet. Michael: “It’s a lot of heavy and sticky.”

Morgan

Chocolate Date Cake, Banana Anise Cream & Coffee Kahlua Jelly

Morgan tells the judges he made his dessert in blocks and columns to resemble a newspaper. (He’s so proud of himself. Ick.)

Johnny thinks it looks South Beach-esque. (That’s not a criticism.) Gail thinks it looks art deco. Dannielle thinks it looks like a little building. Johnny likes it overall, but Gail thinks the cake is really dry.

Heather

Spicy Chocolate Gingerbread Torte with Frozen Crème Anglaise & Blackberry Compote

Johnny points out how much red is on the plate and isn’t happy with Heather as far as completing the challenge. Heather isn’t bothered and says she still wanted to use those flavors.

The judges all seem to think it’s “tasty”, even if it’s not all black and white.

Eric

Mississippi Mud Cake with Earl Grey Whipped Cream & Hot Fudge Sauce

Gail is super impressed with his presentation (for once) and Eric is VERY happy with that. Johnny thinks he’s pretty close to the idea of the black and white and they all like it.

Danielle

Lemongrass & Ginger Truffle, Peppercorn Meringue & Chocolate Sandwich Cookie

As I said before, she made the numbers One, Two and Three. Zac says it look like “an amateur mistake”. Let’s get real, it looks like hell.

The judges are most bothered by the fact that the three things don’t relate to each other. Michael puts it gently – “It’s not cohesive.”

Gail says, unbelievably, that they should have a hard time making a decision tonight. There should be no question. Danielle shouldn’t even make it to Judges’ Table, she should be escorted from the room.

They call in Erika, Heather and Danielle. The guys are incredulous.

It turns out the three women have the lowest scores of the night. The judges basically think the Heather is a stubborn witch who decided what she wanted to do, no matter what the challenge is, even if she went outside the boundaries of the challenge. (Which nutcase chef does THAT remind you of?)

Erika says she thought her ice cream was nice and light. Johnny is incredulous. They all thought something was actually wrong with it. Judge Dannielle is funny, “The ice cream tasted like soap. It was really…(wait for it)…disappointing.” I guess that’s one way of putting it. Erika looks confused. That really is a problem if it was THAT bad and she had no clue.

Michael wants to know if Danielle thought about how each of the components would come together. In as word, no.

Then Johnny says something interesting. He says that Danielle should have thought about the order that people would eat her dessert in. He said she should have told the tasters if there was a special way to eat the dessert that would give it the most impact. (There wasn’t.)

The weird thing is that the judges question the gals and then tell them to send in ALL the guys, without deciding who is going home. The other weird thing is that the gals don’t tell the guys that they (the girls) are on the bottom. The guys go in really anxiously. When they’re told they’re on the top, they practically plotz.

Gail asks if Zac is happy that he gave up immunity for $5000. He says NOW I am.

Okay, yada, yada, yada. The judges NOW say to the guys that they like everything, even though at the event, various elements were too dry or too sweet. The winner is…Yigit. Eh! Whatever, let’s get to the part where Danielle goes home.

Oy, Erika goes home. I guess Danielle’s was bad, but there wasn’t one element that was really awful and Erika’s ice cream was completely unpalatable.

This was not a terrible episode. We saw more cooking and more creating of the individual elements of the desserts. When there are fewer chefs, they have time to concentrate more on the actual cooking. Also there is no totally over-the-top character left, stealing air time. This still isn’t the most appealing cast of chefs, but hopefully the remaining episodes will only improve.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Hurrah For Harissa

This weekend, I saw Anne marinating chicken in harissa. I LOVE harissa - that super spicy condiment that is an essential go-along with couscous. Anne made her own harissa. It looked awesome. Lately, I’ve been using this handy harissa from a tube. It’s mighty hot and slightly smoky, which is just what I need from my harissa.

It got me to thinking about one of my favorite recipes - Moroccan Chicken Couscous.

This is basically a well-spiced AND spicy stew, which can be made vegetarian…or not. The couscous in the name of the recipe comes from what the stew is served over – freshly made couscous.

Moroccan Chicken Couscous (serves 6)

Printable recipe here

Don’t be fazed by the long list of ingredients. You’ll probably have most of these spices in your cupboard.

2 tbls. olive oil

8 pieces of chicken – thighs, legs or breast, skinned if desired

3 onions, thinly sliced

2 cloves garlic, crushed

½ tsp. turmeric

½ tsp. ground ginger

2 tsps. cumin

Dash of cayenne pepper

Freshly ground black pepper

2 cups tomato purée

4 cups vegetable or chicken stock OR water

2 tsps. sugar

½ tsp. saffron threads

2 cups pumpkin or butternut squash pieces, peeled and cut into ¾ inch pieces

6 carrots, peeled and cut into ¾ inch piece

3 Idaho potatoes, peeled and cut into ¾ inch pieces

2 zucchini, halved lengthwise and cut into ¾ inch slices

1 15 oz. can chickpeas, drained and rinsed well

½ cup raisins

1 cup prunes, snipped into quarters

1 box of couscous, made according to package instructions - see note below

Heat oil over medium high heat in large heavy-bottomed sauté pan, Dutch oven or stock pot. Cook chicken until browned on both sides. Remove chicken from pan and set aside.

Turn heat down to medium and add onions. Cook until soft and translucent. Add garlic and cook for 1 minute. Turn heat to low. Stir in turmeric, ground ginger, cumin, cayenne and black pepper and cook for two minutes.

Add tomato purée, stock or water, sugar and saffron. Bring to boil, cover, reduce heat and simmer for 10 minutes.

Add the chicken back into the pot with the pumpkin, carrots and potatoes and simmer, covered, for 10 minutes.

Stir in zucchini, chickpeas, raisins and prunes. Cover and simmer for 25 more minutes or until potatoes are cooked. Serve over cooked couscous with harissa.

For a vegetarian version, simply leave out the chicken and start the recipe by softening the onions in the olive oil.


Note: Use vegetable or chicken stock when making the couscous to serve with this. Also I often add a ladleful of the juicy stew itself to the liquid for the couscous, before I stir in the uncooked couscous. It adds a lot of extra flavor.